|
The Similarity of Features of Reincarnation
IAN STEVENSON
Division of Personality Studies, Department of Psychiatric Medicine
University of Virginia Health System
P. O. Box 800152, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0152
e-mail: ips6r@virginia.edu
ERLENDUR HARALDSSON
Department of Psychology, University of Reykjavik, Reykjavik, Iceland
e-mail: erlendur@hi.is
Abstract—The principal features of two series of cases suggestive of reincarnation
in Lebanon were compared. The series were investigated about a
generation apart by two different investigators. In three important features, the
two series were closely similar; in other features they were not similar, probably
because of differences in the thoroughness of investigation in the two
series.
Keywords: reincarnation cases—stability of features
Introduction
Children who claim to remember a previous life (PL) occur in many different
countries and cultures. Investigators can find them most readily in South Asia
and western Asia, but they occur also in Europe and North America (Stevenson,
l987/2001). In many cases, inquiries have shown that the child’s statements
correspond to facts and events in the life of a particular deceased person. In
many of these verified or ‘‘solved’’ cases, investigators have found no normal
means whereby information about the concerned deceased person could have
reached the subject of the case. In other cases, however, careful inquiries have
failed to verify the child’s statements; such cases remain ‘‘unsolved’’ (Cook et al,
l983). In addition to the child’s statements, many cases include behavior by the
child that is unusual in the child’s family but that corresponds to the child’s
statements or to the life and death of the deceased person. For example, among
47 cases in which the child described a previous life that ended in death by
drowning, 30 (64%) subjects had a phobia of being immersed in water
(Stevenson, 1990). In many other cases the subject has birthmarks or birth
defects that correspond closely in location and shape to wounds or other marks
on the concerned deceased person (Stevenson, 1997).
Despite the evidence supporting a paranormal interpretation of some of these
cases, some critics have attributed them to a combination of normal (but Journal of Scienti. c Exploration, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 283–289, 2003 0892-3310/03
283
unnoticed) communications, fantasies (deriving in large part from the belief
in reincarnation in the cultures where most of the cases are found), and
coincidence. A condensed name for this interpretation is the ‘‘socio-psychological
hypothesis’’ (Brody, 1979; Littlewood, 2001; Schouten & Stevenson,
1998). We believe that the stability of some features of cases of the reincarnation
type weighs against the view that they derive from fantasies; we remain
fully aware, however, that the cases minimally require evidence of a paranormal
process before we can invoke reincarnation as their best interpretation.
Two previous examinations of the stability of features of these cases over time,
in India (Pasricha & Stevenson, l987) and in Turkey (Keil & Stevenson, 1999),
have shown such stability. In India, the stability occurred in cases two generations
apart; in Turkey, the compared series of cases were one generation apart.
This article reports a third study of the stability of features of cases of the
reincarnation type, this one concerning cases among the Druses of Lebanon.
The Druses (sometimes spelled Druzes) form a fairly compact and substantial
religious group in Lebanon and neighboring countries. Although their religion
originally derived from Islam, the Druses now regard it as separate from Islam.
Reincarnation is a central tenet of their beliefs. They have numerous cases of
children who claim to remember previous lives (Stevenson, 1966/l974, 1980).
One of us (I.S.) investigated Druse cases of the reincarnation type between l964
and l981. The civil wars in Lebanon then interrupted investigations there. E.H.
resumed the investigations in 1998–2001. The median year of investigation for
the I.S. cases was l972 and that for the E.H. cases was l999. The two series,
therefore, occurred about a generation apart.
Methods of Investigation
Interviews with firsthand witnesses of the child’s statements and of any
unusual behavior on the part of the child formed the principal method of
investigation. In solved cases, qualified informants for the life of the identified
deceased person, such as a widow or widower, were interviewed. When feasible,
we checked dates provided by informants’ memories against Identity Cards or
other records. (Identity Cards, however, were often unreliable in Lebanon in the
l970s and l980s.) Relevant medical records were also sought and copied.
We made notes as the informants talked. Skilled interpreters assisted us in
most cases. We recorded demographic data on a Registration Form. A checklist
(on the Form) of salient features permitted us to conduct somewhat systematic
interviews, so that, in general, we elicited similar information about the different
cases. Nevertheless, the emphases of our investigations differed to some extent.
In his investigations, I.S. concentrated on examining the evidence for or against
paranormal interpretations of the case. In contrast, E.H. concentrated on
psychological characteristics of the subjects. He satisfied himself concerning the
authenticity of the cases he wished to include in a program of psychological
testing, which would be similar to one he had conducted for cases in Sri Lanka
284 I. Stevenson & E. Haraldsson
(Haraldsson, 1995, l997; Haraldsson, Fowler, & Periyannanpillai, 2000;
Haraldsson & Abu-Izzeddin, 2002). Therefore, with a few exceptions, he did not
investigate the cases of his series in as much detail as I.S. had for his series.
Coders, examining the array of details in the case notes, judged
the ‘‘thoroughness’’ of each investigation. They judged 29 (more than half) of
the I.S.’s cases to have been ‘‘thoroughly’’ or ‘‘fairly thoroughly’’ investigated,
whereas only 4 (13%) of E.H.’s cases were so judged. Nevertheless, E.H. obtained
sufficient data about the cases he studied for the purposes of the present
comparisons. For some other comparisons the data from the E.H. series were
insufficient.
The data from the Registration Forms, field notes, and any printed records
were entered in a codebook and then into SPSS Ver. 10.1 so that we could make
the comparisons we wished.
Results
The I.S. series had 55 cases; 39 (71%) of the subjects were male and 16 (29%)
female. The E.H. series had 30 cases; 19 (63%) of the subjects were male and 11
(37%) female. (Other series of cases have usually shown a preponderance of
male subjects the reasons for which need not detain us here [Stevenson, 1987/
2001].) In every case, the past lives to which the subjects referred were those of
Druse persons.
The birth years of the I.S. cases ranged between 1907 and 1974 with a mean of
1952.The birth years of the E.H. cases ranged between 1984 and l993 with a mean
of 1989. The means of the subjects’ ages when their cases were first investigated
were 20 years for the I.S. series and 10.5 years for the E.H. series. As mentioned,
E.H. was primarily interested in finding young subjects who could be given
psychological tests. His assistant, who was ascertaining cases for him, directed
him only toward cases of which the subjects were still children. The oldest subject
in his series was 13 years old, whereas 30 (more than half) of the subjects in the
IS series were more than 13 years old when their cases were first investigated. Features of Cases on Side of the Subject Subject’s Age When First Speaking about Previous Life. In the I.S. series, the
mean age of first instance of speaking about the previous life was 31 months
(range: 12–66). In the E.H. series, the mean age of first instance of speaking
about the previous life was 32 months (range: 18–48). Subject’s Age When Stopped Speaking about Previous Life. In the I.S. series
the mean age when the subject stopped speaking spontaneously about the
previous life was 161 months (13 years) (range: 102–336 months). For the E.H.
series, the mean age for no longer speaking spontaneously about the previous
life was 67 months (5.6 years) (range: 60–74 months). Number and Kind of Statements Subjects Made about Previous Life. In the I.S.
series, the mean number of statements about the previous life the subjects made
Stability of Case Features 285
was 23 (range: 3–74). For the E.H. series the mean number of statements about
the previous life was 10.3 (range: 3–23). In the I.S. series, the subject mentioned
the mode of death in 42 (82%) cases. In the E.H. series, 25 subjects (83%)
mentioned the mode of death. In the I.S. series, 43 (88%) subjectsmentioned the
previous personality’s name. In the E.H. series, 19 (63%) of the subjects
mentioned the previous personality’s name. In the I.S. series, 31 (56%) of the
subjects mentioned or otherwise indicated the previous personality’s place of
residence. In the E.H. series, 16 (53%) of the subjects did this. Unusual Behavior on the Part of the Subject. Phobias related to the previous
life (usually to the mode of death) occurred frequently in both series. Phobias
occurred in 77% of the I.S. cases and in 42% of the E.H. cases. These incidences
of phobias exceed those found in the cases of other cultures. Among 179 solved
cases of five other cultures (Burma [now Myanmar], India, Sri Lanka, Thailand,
and the United States [nontribal cases]), phobias occurred in 60 (33%) cases.
Many children who say they remember a previous life behave as if they were
still adults. For example, they may assume a parental role toward the previous
personality’s children; they may address adults familiarly instead of deferentially
as most children would; and they may be capable of assuming greater
responsibilities than the usual child of the same age. We classify such behavior
as ‘‘adult attitude.’’ We observed some examples of ‘‘adult attitude’’ among the
Druse cases. Suleyman Andary, for example, showed it to such an extent that he
was nicknamed ‘‘mukhtar’’ (Arabic for headman) (Stevenson, l980). Nevertheless,
we also found the trait difficult to appraise because of the tendency of the
subjects’ parents in Lebanon (and elsewhere) to think of the subjects as superior
persons with consequential effects on the children’s behavior. Accordingly, we
do not include here any figure for the incidence of ‘‘adult attitude.’’ Identification and Features of Previous Personality For convenience only and without commitment to any interpretation of the
cases, we refer to the concerned deceased person in a case as the ‘‘previous
personality.’’ The term is useful whether or not the families concerned or the
investigators have identified a deceased person correctly corresponding to the
subject’s statements. Cases with and without the identification of such a person
are regarded respectively as ‘‘solved’’ and ‘‘unsolved.’’ For the reasons stated, I.S.
and E.H. dealt with the verification of the subjects’ statements differently. By
conducting independent verifications, I.S. classified 41 (74%) of his cases as
solved. E.H., however, investigated only four of his cases thoroughly.He did not
consider the other cases in his series necessarily solved, although 93% of the
subjects’ families in his series believed that they were solved. Mode of Death. In both series, a high incidence of violent mode of death
occurred. In the I.S. series, the previous personality died violently in 36 (73%) of
cases. In the E.H. series, violent death occurred in 24 (80%) of cases. Previous Personality’s Age at Death. In keeping with the high incidence of
violent death, both series showed a young age of the previous personality at
286 I. Stevenson & E. Haraldsson
the time of death. In the I.S. series, the mean age at death of the previous
personalities was 34 years; in the E.H. series, it was 38 years. Interval between Previous Personality’s Death and Subject’s Birth. The mean
interval between the previous personality’s death and the subject’s birth was
23 months in the I.S. series and 46 months in the E.H. series.
Tables 1 and 2 summarize the results of the principal comparisons between the series. They provide for each variable the number of cases from which the data derived.
Discussion
Before discussing the similarities and differences between the two series
of cases, we will mention that some demographic features of the cases in
both series are not representative of the general population in Lebanon. Unfortunately,
we have few data to support this statement. We have not learned of
any accurate vital statistics about the population of Lebanon for the years of the
I.S. series. The collection of such statistics was at first inhibited for political
reasons and then made impossible during the civil wars of the 1970s and l980s.
For 1999, the life expectancy in Lebanon was 68 years for men and 72 years for
women (United Nations, 2001). The mean age at death of the previous
personalities was 34 in the I.S. series and 38 in the E.H. series. We have not
obtained any figures for the incidence of violent death in the general population
of Lebanon. Nevertheless, we believe the incidence of violent death in both
series far exceeds that in the general population.
We should mention that the cases among the Druses differ from those of many
other cultures (but not all) in the absence of claims to remember the life of a
person of the opposite sex. Also, birthmarks and birth defects rarely occur in
cases among the Druses.
The features of the two series were similar in some important respects, but
differed in others. They were similar in such salient features as the age of first
Tables 1 and 2 summarize the results of the principal comparisons between
the series. They provide for each variable the number of cases from which the
data derived.
Discussion
Before discussing the similarities and differences between the two series
of cases, we will mention that some demographic features of the cases in
both series are not representative of the general population in Lebanon. Unfortunately,
we have few data to support this statement. We have not learned of
any accurate vital statistics about the population of Lebanon for the years of the
I.S. series. The collection of such statistics was at first inhibited for political
reasons and then made impossible during the civil wars of the 1970s and l980s.
For 1999, the life expectancy in Lebanon was 68 years for men and 72 years for
women (United Nations, 2001). The mean age at death of the previous
personalities was 34 in the I.S. series and 38 in the E.H. series. We have not
obtained any figures for the incidence of violent death in the general population
of Lebanon. Nevertheless, we believe the incidence of violent death in both
series far exceeds that in the general population.
We should mention that the cases among the Druses differ from those of many
other cultures (but not all) in the absence of claims to remember the life of a
person of the opposite sex. Also, birthmarks and birth defects rarely occur in
cases among the Druses.
The features of the two series were similar in some important respects, but
differed in others. They were similar in such salient features as the age of first
TABLE 1
Features of Subject’s Side of Case
Variable I.S. Series (N ˆ 55) E.H. Series (N ˆ 30)
Mean age of first speaking of PL 31 months (n ˆ 37)a 32 months (n ˆ 29)
Mean age when stopped speaking of PL 161 months (n ˆ 29) 67 months (n ˆ 4)
Mean number of statements subject made 23 (n ˆ 51) 10.3 (n ˆ 30)
Mention of mode of death 82% (n ˆ 51) 83% (n ˆ 30)
Mention of previous personality’s name 88% (n ˆ 49) 63% (n ˆ 30)
Mention or correct indication of previous
personality’s residence
56% (n ˆ 55) 53% (n ˆ 30)
Phobia 77% (n ˆ 30) 42% (n ˆ 24)
a Lower case ‘‘n’’ indicates number of cases furnishing information for this item.
Stability of Case Features 287
speaking of the previous life, mention of the mode of death by the subject, and
the high incidence of a violent mode of death.
A noteworthy difference between the two series occurred in the age when
the subjects stopped speaking about the previous life. We may explain this
difference by the different ages of the subjects at the time the cases of the two
series were investigated. As mentioned, E.H. sought to study subjects who were
children, and the oldest subject in his series was only 13 years old. I.S. included
many subjects who were older children or even already adults. Only four of the
children in E.H.’s series had stopped speaking spontaneously about the previous
life at the time of his investigations.
I.S. required verification from the previous personality’s family members
before he considered a case solved. E.H. could not state how many of the cases
in his series were solved. He only recorded that 93% of the subjects’ families
believed the case with which they were concerned had been solved. The
difference in verification may explain the lower incidence of cases considered
solved in the I.S. series.
Some other differences between the two series, such as the number of
statements the subjects made and the incidence of phobias, may derive from the
greater attention I.S. gave, both to the recording and independent verification of
the subject’s statements and to evaluating the appropriateness of any unusual
behavior on the part of the subject to the life or behavior of the previous
personality. Different informants often remember different statements they
heard the subject make. Cases judged to have been investigated ‘‘thoroughly’’
or ‘‘fairly thoroughly’’ have more informants. For the four cases that E.H.
investigated thoroughly, the mean number of statements was 18, which was
almost twice as many as the mean for the 30 E.H. cases considered as a whole.
The similarities between the two series—the age of first speaking of the
previous life, the mention of the mode of death by the subject, and the high
incidence of a violent mode of death—show that the cases of children who claim
to remember a previous life are a recurrent phenomenon. Although the stability of
some features of the cases over many years seems important to us as weighing
against their interpretation as fantasies, a judgment about reincarnation as a better
interpretation depends on evidence of paranormal processes in individual cases.
TABLE 2
Identification and Features of Previous Personality
Variable I.S. Series (N ˆ 55) E.H. Series (N ˆ 30)
Considered solveda 74% (n ˆ 55)b 93% (n ˆ 30)
Mode of death violent 73% (n ˆ 49) 80% (n ˆ 30)
Mean age at death (in years) 34 (n ˆ 36) 38 (n ˆ 14)
Mean interval between previous personality’s
death and subject’s birth (in months)
23 (n ˆ 51) 46 (n ˆ 12)
a See text for different criteria for judging a case solved in the two series.
b Lower case ‘‘n’’ indicates number of cases furnishing information for this item.
288 I. Stevenson & E. Haraldsson
Acknowledgments
The research of the Division of Personality Studies is supported by the
Lifebridge Foundation, the Azuma Nagamasa Memorial Fund, the Bernstein
Brothers Foundation, Richard Adams, and several anonymous donors. The
Bial Foundation supported E.H.’s investigations in Lebanon of cases of the reincarnation
type among the Druses. We thank Dawn E. Hunt and Martha Mercier
for careful checking of the data in the paper. Dr. Emily Kelly improved
it with numerous critical comments. We benefited from a careful reading of
the paper by Dr. Jim Tucker. Dr. Alan Gauld and Dr. Jürgen Keil both provided
cautionary advice about the interpretation of our results.
References
Brody, E. B. (1979). Review of Cases of the Reincarnation Type. Vol. II. Ten Cases in Sri Lanka by
Ian Stevenson. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167, 769–774.
Cook, E.W., Pasricha, S., Samararatne, G., Win Maung, & Stevenson, I. (1983). A review and
analysis of ‘‘unsolved’’ cases of the reincarnation type. Part II: Comparison of features of solved
and unsolved cases. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 77, 115–135.
Haraldsson, E. (1995). Personality and abilities of children claiming previous life memories. Journal
of Nervous and Mental Disease, 183, 445–451.
Haraldsson, E. (1997). A psychological comparison between ordinary children and those who claim
previous-life memories. Journal of Scienti. c Exploration, 11, 323–335.
Haraldsson, E., Fowler, P., & Perriyannanpillai, V. (2000). Psychological characteristics of children
who speak of a previous life. A further . eld study in Sri Lanka. Transcultural Psychiatry, 37, 525–
544.
Haraldsson, E., & Abu-Izzeddin, M. (2002). Development of certainty about the correct deceased
person in a case of the reincarnation type: The case of Nazih Al-Danaf. Journal of Scienti. c
Exploration, 16, 363–380.
Keil, J., & Stevenson, I. (1999). Do cases of the reincarnation type show similar features over many
years? A study of Turkish cases a generation apart. Journal of Scienti. c Exploration, 13, 189–198.
Littlewood, R. (2001). Social institutions and psychological explanations: Druze reincarnation as
a therapeutic resource. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 74, 213–222.
Pasricha, S., & Stevenson, I. (1987). Indian cases of the reincarnation type two generations apart.
Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 54, 239–246.
Schouten, S., & Stevenson, I. (1998). Does the socio-psychological hypothesis explain cases of the
reincarnation type? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 504–506.
Stevenson, I. (1966/1974). Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation. 2nd ed. rev. Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia. (First published in l966.)
Stevenson, I. (1980). Cases of the Reincarnation Type. Vol. III. Twelve Cases in Lebanon and Turkey.
Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Stevenson, I. (1990). Phobias in children who claim to remember previous lives. Journal of Scienti. c
Exploration, 4, 243–254.
Stevenson, I. (1997). Reincarnation and Biology: A Contribution to the Etiology of Birthmarks and
Birth Defects. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Stevenson, I. (1987/2001). Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A question of Reincarnation.
Rev. ed. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company. (First published in l987; Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia.)
United Nations. (2001). Demographic Yearbook 1999. New York: United Nations.
Stability of Case Features 289
Reincarnation for the Druze
Reincarnation: It's Background
REINCARNATION: Its meaning and consequences by Ernest Valea
Reincarnation in world religions
Past-life recall as proof for reincarnation
Reincarnation and cosmic justice
Reincarnation and Christianity
Precedent at Dar al-Hikma - Chapter 10 from Metaphysics by Default.
Evidence of Reincarnation
Prominent people who accepted reincarnation and/or appeared to recall past lives
Reincarnation: Socrates to Salinger
The Fifth Ecumenical Council, The Second Council Of Constantinople, A.D. 553, The Anathemas Against Origen. New Clothes for Old Souls
There Is No Death
Druze Belief in Reincarnation
The Similarity of Features of Reincarnation Type Cases
over Many Years A Third Study New Article
The Merciful Veil of Oblivion New Article The Explanations About Evolution and Reincarnation of the Spirit New Article
The Divine Gift of Reincarnation. External Link The Reincarnation In the Bible I External Link
More about The Reincarnation In the Bible II External Link Reincarnation and Western Religions- The Controversy External Link
The divine law of reincarnation as an spiritual doctrine External Link
Reincarnation and Western Religions -The Scriptures External Link
Reincarnation and Western Religions -Conclusion External Link
Reincarnation and Human Science External Link A Parable: The many options of reincarnation External Link
Paul Misunderstood External Link
|